Separate-tenancy use: consent was required
A photographed later council appraisal records correspondence to “Binima Pty Ltd” about kitchen expansion and separate-tenancy use. It says subsequent correspondence advised that development consent was required and that the backroom did not enjoy existing-use rights. The same later council-history page also records DA 91/026 approved on 12 March 1991 to establish a real-estate agency; this is distinct from the later separate-tenancy correspondence.

Sources and record notes
The displayed detail is the historical correspondence paragraph only. It is a later account, not the original letter or a formal refusal determination. The appraisal date and evidence of delivery have not been established.


